Ex-Pakistan PM Imran Khan apologises in contempt of court case | Imran Khan News

Pakistan courtroom defers contempt proceedings in opposition to the PTI chief after he says he’s keen to apologise to the feminine decide.

Islamabad, Pakistan – A courtroom in Pakistan has deferred contempt proceedings in opposition to former Prime Minister Imran Khan after he stated he was keen to apologise for his remarks in opposition to a feminine decide.

“If the courtroom needs, I’ll go to the woman decide and apologise to her. I’ll by no means say something that can harm the sentiments of the courtroom or judiciary,” Khan advised the Islamabad Excessive Courtroom throughout a listening to on Thursday.

“I guarantee the courtroom I cannot do one thing like this in future,” he stated. “I’m sorry if I crossed a crimson line.”

If convicted, Khan risked being disqualified from holding a public publish for no less than 5 years, in keeping with Pakistan’s legal guidelines.

Following Khan’s apology, the courtroom determined to not indict the cricketing icon-turned-politician, asking him to submit his assertion in an affidavit earlier than the subsequent listening to on October 3.

Khan was charged with contempt of courtroom following a speech he made at a public rally in capital Islamabad on August 20, the place he threatened “motion” in opposition to Decide Zeba Chaudhry and senior Islamabad police officers for arresting his prime aide Shahbaz Gill.

Following remarks made throughout a TV present, Gill was charged with trying to incite a mutiny in Pakistan’s highly effective army, an allegation Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) get together denies.

Earlier this week, the identical courtroom additionally dropped terrorism prices in opposition to Khan for his remarks in the course of the Islamabad rally.

Khan’s authorities was eliminated by a parliamentary vote of no-confidence in April this 12 months. Since then, he has been holding public rallies throughout the nation, demanding new elections, that are in any other case due late subsequent 12 months.

Malaysia’s Najib arrives at court for final leg of 1MDB appeal | Corruption News

Ex-PM is petitioning Malaysia’s prime courtroom to quash his corruption conviction and 12-year jail sentence in case linked to the 1MDB monetary scandal.

Former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak has arrived on the nation’s prime courtroom for the ultimate leg of his attraction to put aside his corruption conviction and 12-year jail sentence over a case linked to the 1MDB monetary scandal.

The Federal Court docket may doubtlessly ship its verdict on Tuesday or set a brand new date for its choice. Malaysian prosecutors wrapped up their arguments on Friday, whereas Najib’s attorneys declined to current their submissions, citing inadequate time to organize.

Najib arrived simply forward of courtroom proceedings scheduled to start out at 9:30am (01:30 GMT).

He waved to reporters however didn’t make any remark.

A few hundred supporters had gathered outdoors the courtroom, with some shouting “Allahu Akbar” and “Justice for Najib”.

Najib, 69, was discovered responsible in July 2020 of legal breach of belief, abuse of energy, and cash laundering for illegally receiving about $10m from SRC Worldwide, a former unit of state fund 1Malaysia Growth Berhad (1MDB).

Najib, who pleaded not responsible, was sentenced to 12 years of jail and a 210 million ringgit ($46.8m) high-quality.

Supporters of former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak shout slogans outside the Federal Court, in Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Supporters of former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak shout slogans outdoors the Federal Court docket, in Putrajaya, Malaysia, August 23, 2022 [Lai Seng Sin/ Reuters]

Prosecutors have stated some $4.5bn was stolen from 1MDB – cofounded by Najib as premier in 2009 – in a wide-ranging scandal that has implicated officers and monetary establishments all over the world.

Najib, who faces a number of trials over the allegations, has persistently denied wrongdoing.

The previous prime minister changed his authorized workforce simply three weeks earlier than his remaining attraction on the Federal Court docket started final week.

Najib has stated that his proper to a good trial was in danger, after the courtroom rejected a number of requests to postpone the attraction to permit his new authorized workforce to organize absolutely.

His earlier attorneys had submitted a written petition forward of the hearings.

In his submissions, Najib listed 94 the explanation why he ought to be acquitted, together with that decrease courts had erred in a few of their findings.

Prosecutors have stated Najib was conscious that the funds obtained in his account have been proceeds from “an illegal exercise,” and had exercised his place as prime minister, finance minister and adviser to SRC Worldwide to acquire the funds.

US court rejects Ben & Jerry’s push to block sales in West Bank | Israel-Palestine conflict News

Decide says the corporate didn’t present gross sales of its ice cream in occupied Palestinian territories triggered ‘irreparable hurt’.

A decide in the USA has dominated towards an effort by Ben & Jerry’s to dam its dad or mum firm Unilever from resuming ice cream gross sales within the occupied West Financial institution.

US District Decide Andrew Carter wrote on Monday that Unilever’s choice to licence Ben & Jerry’s merchandise to an Israeli agency didn’t trigger “irreparable hurt” to the Vermont-based ice cream firm, and subsequently it didn’t benefit an injunction by the courtroom.

Ben & Jerry’s had sued Unilever in July, arguing that promoting its ice cream within the occupied West Financial institution undermines its progressive social mission and confuses shoppers.

Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry’s in 2000, however the deal allowed the corporate to keep up management over its model and social mission. The lawsuit accused Unilever of breaching the merger settlement.

In his choice, Carter mentioned Ben & Jerry’s arguments don’t meet the authorized necessities for the courtroom to dam Unilever from persevering with gross sales within the West Financial institution. He dominated that the place of Ben & Jerry’s is thought to shoppers, together with by means of media protection of the lawsuit towards Unilever.

“Additional, the merchandise bought in Israel and the West Financial institution will use no English emblems, as an alternative displaying new Hebrew and Arabic language Ben & Jerry’s emblems,” the decide wrote. “Thus, the merchandise bought in Israel and the West Financial institution will likely be dissimilar from different Ben & Jerry’s merchandise, mitigating, if not eliminating, the potential for reputational hurt.”

Final yr, Ben & Jerry’s – which backs a number of social justice causes – ended gross sales within the occupied Palestinian territories, together with the West Financial institution and East Jerusalem, saying that doing enterprise in unlawful Israeli settlements is inconsistent with its values.

The transfer set off a firestorm of criticism from Israel’s advocates, lots of whom accused the corporate – based by two Jewish-American males – of anti-Semitism.

A number of US states additionally moved to penalise Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever over the choice in what many Palestinian rights supporters say was a well-known crackdown on free speech important of Israel.

After practically a yr of sustained stress, together with from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a staunchly pro-Israel, Jewish-American advocacy group, Unilever determined to bypass Ben & Jerry’s choice by licensing the ice cream gross sales to a 3rd social gathering in Israel.

The choice was met with cheers from Israel’s supporters, who mentioned it was a victory towards the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) motion, which goals to stress Israel by means of non-violent means to finish abuses towards Palestinians.

Ben & Jerry’s has mentioned that ending gross sales within the West Financial institution is just not a part of BDS.

The US has seen a slew of legal guidelines prohibiting boycotts of Israel lately, drawing criticism from free speech advocates who argue that such measures threaten People’ constitutional proper to free expression and search to stifle criticism of Israeli insurance policies.

A number of rights teams, together with Human Rights Watch and Amnesty Worldwide, have accused Israel of imposing apartheid towards Palestinians.

Lina Assi, a spokeswoman for Palestine Authorized, a US-based group that combats crackdowns on Palestinian rights advocacy, advised Al Jazeera in July that anti-BDS legal guidelines are a part of “broader makes an attempt to malign and silence significant solidarity with Palestinians”.

Twitter to India court: Overturn gov’t orders to remove content | Business and Economy News

Twitter has requested an Indian court docket to overturn some authorities orders to take away content material from the social media platform, a supply acquainted with the matter stated, in a authorized problem which alleges abuse of energy by officers.

The US firm’s try on Tuesday to get a judicial assessment of the orders is a part of a rising confrontation with New Delhi.

Twitter has been requested by Indian authorities over the previous yr to behave on content material together with accounts supportive of an impartial Sikh state, posts alleged to have unfold misinformation about protests by farmers and tweets crucial of the federal government’s dealing with of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Be it any firm, in any sector, they need to abide the legal guidelines of India,” India’s IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw informed Reuters accomplice ANI on Tuesday, responding to questions on Twitter’s authorized transfer.

The IT ministry didn’t reply to a request for remark from Reuters.

The Indian authorities has beforehand stated that large social media corporations, together with Twitter, haven’t complied with removing requests, regardless of their authorized standing.

Late final month, Twitter was warned by the IT ministry of prison proceedings if it didn’t adjust to some orders. Twitter complied this week, the supply stated, in order to not lose legal responsibility exemptions accessible as a bunch of content material.

In a submitting with the highest court docket within the southern Indian state of Karnataka, Twitter argued that some removing orders fell wanting the procedural necessities of India’s IT act, the supply stated, with out specifying which of them it wished to be reviewed.

The IT act permits the federal government to dam public entry to content material within the curiosity of nationwide safety, amongst different causes.

Twitter, which market analysis corporations say has almost 24 million customers in India, additionally argues in its submitting that among the orders failed to present discover to authors of the content material.

It says that some had been associated to political content material posted by official handles of political events, the blocking of which quantity to a violation of freedom of speech, the supply added.

All corporations, together with overseas social media intermediaries, have a proper to method the courts, junior IT minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar stated in a tweet hours after Twitter’s authorized transfer, with out naming the agency.

“However equally ALL middleman/platforms working right here, have unambiguous obligation to adjust to our legal guidelines and guidelines,” he stated.

Tensions flared

Tensions with the Indian authorities flared early final yr when Twitter declined to completely adjust to an order to take down accounts and posts which New Delhi alleged had been spreading misinformation about anti-government protests by farmers.

The corporate has additionally been topic to police investigations in India, and final yr many authorities ministers moved to domestically developed platform Koo, accusing Twitter of non-compliance with native legal guidelines.

Twitter has additionally confronted a backlash in India for blocking accounts of influential people, together with politicians, citing violations of its insurance policies.

India, which business transparency experiences present has among the many highest authorities requests for content material takedowns, is contemplating some amendments to its new IT guidelines, together with the introduction of a government-run appeals panel with the facility to reverse the content material moderation selections of social media corporations.

New Delhi has stated such measures had been wanted as a result of the businesses had violated Indians’ constitutional rights.

Juul appeals to US federal court to end ban on e-cigarettes | Health News

Firm has been extensively blamed for surge in underage vaping, however latest survey exhibits a drop in teen vaping price in US.

Juul, the digital cigarette maker, has requested a federal courtroom in america to dam a authorities order to cease promoting its merchandise within the nation.

The corporate on Friday requested the courtroom to pause what it calls an “extraordinary and illegal motion” by the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) that might require it to right away halt its enterprise.

The corporate filed an emergency movement with the US Court docket of Appeals in Washington because it prepares to enchantment the FDA’s choice.

The FDA mentioned on Thursday that Juul should cease promoting its vaping system and its tobacco and menthol flavoured cartridges.

The event comes amid a sweeping effort by the company to convey scientific scrutiny to the multibillion-dollar vaping trade after years of regulatory delays.

Juul product
The FDA mentioned earlier this week that Juul should cease promoting its merchandise within the US [File: Elijah Nouvelage/Reuters]

To remain available on the market, firms should present that their e-cigarettes profit public well being. In apply, meaning proving that grownup people who smoke who use them are prone to give up or cut back their smoking, whereas teenagers are unlikely to get hooked on them.

The FDA mentioned Juul’s utility left regulators with important questions and didn’t embody sufficient data to guage any potential well being dangers.

Juul mentioned it submitted sufficient data and information to handle all points raised. The corporate mentioned the FDA refused its request to place its order on maintain to keep away from a large disruption to its enterprise.

Whereas Juul stays a high vendor, its share of the US e-cigarette market has dipped to about half. The corporate was extensively blamed for a surge in underage vaping a number of years in the past, however a latest federal survey confirmed a drop within the teen vaping price and a shift away from Juul’s merchandise.

The gadgets warmth a nicotine answer right into a vapor that’s inhaled, bypassing lots of the poisonous chemical compounds produced by burning tobacco.

The corporate mentioned in its Friday courtroom submitting that it submitted a 125,000-page utility to the FDA practically two years in the past. It mentioned the appliance included a number of research to guage the well being dangers amongst Juul customers.

Juul mentioned that the FDA can not argue that there was a “vital and pressing public curiosity” in instantly eradicating its merchandise from the market when the company allowed them to be bought throughout its evaluation.

It additionally mentioned the FDA’s choice to dam gross sales of its merchandise was “extraordinary and illegal”, citing, amongst different issues, the company authorising related e-cigarette merchandise made by competing producers.

Woman smoking
The e-cigarette gadgets warmth a nicotine answer right into a vapor that’s inhaled [File: Craig Mitchelldyer/AP Photo]

Juul added that the ban was a departure from the company’s regular practices, which usually contain permitting a transitional interval, and questioned the company’s “immense political strain from Congress”.

In 2019, Juul was pressured into halting all promoting and eliminating its fruit and dessert flavours after they grew to become in style amongst center and highschool college students. The following yr, the FDA restricted flavours in small vaping gadgets to simply tobacco and menthol.

The as soon as red-hot vape firm has additionally been working with its authorized advisers on choices that embody a doable chapter submitting whether it is unable to get reduction from the federal government’s ban, the Wall Road Journal reported on Friday, citing individuals conversant in the matter.

The FDA declined to touch upon Juul’s submitting when contacted by the Reuters information company.

Juul additionally declined to touch upon the WSJ report.

Roe v Wade: US Supreme Court overturns landmark abortion ruling | Women News

US prime court docket overturns landmark 1973 determination, upending practically 5 a long time of abortion entry within the nation.

The US Supreme Courtroom has overturned Roe v Wade, the landmark ruling that granted the best to abortion for practically 5 a long time in america.

Within the determination on Friday, the nation’s prime court docket dominated in a Mississippi case that “The Structure doesn’t confer a proper to abortion.” The justices voted 6-3 alongside ideological traces.

The anticipated rollback of Roe had sparked widespread protests and condemnation throughout the US, with reproductive rights advocates saying tens of millions of girls will not have entry to abortion companies.

Greater than two dozen US states are more likely to ban abortion now that the 1973 authorized precedent has been overturned, in line with reproductive rights group Guttmacher Institute, a transfer that rights teams say disproportionately harms low-income ladies and communities of color.

This can be a breaking information story. Extra to comply with.

French court blocks Grenoble’s bid to allow full-body swimsuit | Islamophobia News

Prime administrative court docket upholds a authorities problem in opposition to a transfer that revived France’s intense debate on Islam.

A high French court docket has blocked a bid to permit full-body swimsuits for girls at municipal swimming pools within the metropolis of Grenoble, upholding a authorities problem in opposition to a transfer that revived France’s intense debate on Islam.

The Council of State, France’s high administrative court docket, mentioned on Tuesday that “very selective exception to the foundations to fulfill non secular calls for… dangers affecting the correct functioning of public providers and equal remedy of their customers”.

The all-in-one swimsuit, utilized by some Muslim girls to cowl their our bodies and hair whereas bathing, is a controversial difficulty in France.

Led by Mayor Eric Piolle, a member of the Inexperienced Social gathering, town of Grenoble in Might modified its swimming pool guidelines to permit all kinds of bathing fits, not simply conventional swimming costumes for girls and trunks for males, which have been mandated earlier than.

“All we would like is for ladies and men to have the ability to gown how they need,” Piolle mentioned on the time.

Tuesday’s court docket resolution was “a victory for the regulation in opposition to separatism, for secularism and past that, for the entire republic”, Inside Minister Gerald Darmanin wrote on Twitter, referring to a regulation launched final 12 months to counter “Islamist radicalism”.

Makes an attempt by a number of native mayors within the south of France to ban the kind of swimsuit often known as burkini on Mediterranean seashores in the summertime of 2016 kicked off the primary firestorm across the bathing swimsuit.

The restrictions have been finally overturned for being discriminatory.

Burkinis are banned in French state-run swimming pools for hygiene causes – not on non secular grounds – whereas swimmers aren’t below any authorized obligation to cover their faith whereas bathing.

Grenoble isn’t the primary French metropolis to alter its guidelines.

The northwestern metropolis of Rennes quietly up to date its pool code in 2019 to permit “burkinis” and different kinds of swimwear.

Egypt court jails former presidential candidate for 15 years | News

A courtroom in Cairo sentences Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh and a number of other different Islamist leaders to prolonged jail phrases.

An Egyptian courtroom has sentenced former presidential candidate Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh and a number of other distinguished figures from the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood to prolonged jail phrases on Sunday for “spreading false information” and plotting to overthrow the state, experiences Agence France-Presse and the Reuters information company.

Aboul Fotouh, 70, who suffers from a number of medical situations in line with his household, was sentenced to fifteen years in jail topic to enchantment, the courtroom ruling mentioned on Sunday.

Mohamed al-Qassas, the deputy head of Aboul Fotouh’s Sturdy Egypt social gathering, acquired a 10-year sentence.

Additionally receiving a 15-year sentence was the Brotherhood’s former supreme information Mahmoud Ezzat, who’s already serving a number of life sentences on different expenses.

Rights teams have repeatedly criticised such mass sentencings in Egypt and known as on authorities to make sure truthful trials.

The teams, together with Human Rights Watch and Amnesty Worldwide, say the arrests and trials of the likes of Aboul Fotouh and el-Kassas are a part of a authorities crackdown on dissent that focused not solely Islamist political opponents but additionally pro-democracy activists, journalists, and on-line critics.

Aboul Fotouh is a former senior Brotherhood chief who was sacked from the group in 2011 when he determined to run in Egypt’s presidential elections. He and el-Kassas had been detained in February 2018 after voicing harsh criticism of President Abdel Fattah El-Sissi’s authorities.

The courtroom in Cairo additionally sentenced Moaz el-Sharqawi to 10 years in jail on comparable expenses, together with membership in an outlawed group, the Muslim Brotherhood, which Egypt designated as a “terrorist” organisation in 2013.

Egypt banned the Brotherhood after Sisi, then military chief, led the overthrow of democratically-elected Brotherhood President Mohamed Mursi following mass protests in 2013.

Morsi died after collapsing in a jail courtroom in 2019, whereas different leaders of the group have been jailed or left the nation on account of a far-reaching crackdown on political dissent that prolonged to liberal in addition to Islamist critics.

French court upholds fake-job verdict against former PM Fillon | Corruption News

A French appeals courtroom upholds Fillon’s conviction for offering a faux parliamentary assistant job to his spouse.

A French appeals courtroom has upheld a conviction in opposition to former right-wing Prime Minister Francois Fillon for offering a faux parliamentary assistant job to his spouse that noticed her paid hundreds of thousands of euros in public funds.

However Monday’s courtroom trimmed his sentence to 4 years in jail with three suspended – down from 5 years with three suspended when he was first discovered responsible in 2020 over a scandal that derailed Fillon’s presidential ambitions.

His spouse Penelope Fillon was given a suspended two-year jail sentence for the embezzlement cost, down from three years suspended, and the courtroom maintained fines of 375,000 euros ($395,000) for every of them.

They have been additionally ordered to repay 800,000 euros ($843,000) to the lower-house Nationwide Meeting, which reimbursed Penelope for the job as Fillon’s assistant, and which was a civil plaintiff within the case.

Beneath French sentencing tips, it’s unlikely that Fillon will spend any time behind bars, and will be ordered as an alternative to put on an ankle bracelet.

Conservative French presidential candidate Francois Fillon and his wife Penelope arrive for a campaign meeting in Paris
The fake-job scandal derailed Fillon’s presidential ambitions [File: Eric Feferberg/Pool Photo via AP]

The couple, who insisted through the Paris appeals courtroom trial that Penelope had finished real constituency work, was not in courtroom for the decision.

On the November appeals listening to, prosecutors stated there was clear proof that Fillon and his stand-in as MP for the Sarthe division, Marc Joulaud, employed Fillon’s spouse Penelope in an “intangible” or “tenuous” position as a parliamentary assistant between 1998 and 2013.

The courtroom upheld the unique three-year suspended sentence for Joulaud.

US Supreme Court confirms Roe v Wade draft opinion is ‘authentic’ | Courts News

America Supreme Courtroom has mentioned a leaked draft opinion overturning the highest court docket’s precedent-setting Roe v Wade ruling, which set out ladies’s proper to abortion, is “genuine” however doesn’t symbolize a remaining determination.

In an announcement on Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts mentioned he has directed the court docket marshal “to launch an investigation into the supply of the leak”.

“Justices flow into draft opinions internally as a routine and important a part of the Courtroom’s confidential deliberative work. Though the doc described in yesterday’s reviews is genuine, it doesn’t symbolize a call by the Courtroom or the ultimate place of any member on the problems within the case,” the assertion mentioned.

Politico journal first reported on the Supreme Courtroom’s draft majority opinion on Monday night. Written by Justice Samuel Alito, it confirmed the court docket had voted to strike down the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling, which Alito described as “egregiously flawed from the beginning”.

If confirmed, that draft determination would roll again practically 5 many years of entry to abortion within the US.

It has raised considerations that already susceptible individuals, notably Black and different ladies of blended race and low-income ladies, will probably be disproportionately affected – and drawn protests and condemnation from reproductive justice advocates, in addition to progressive lawmakers.

Chatting with reporters on Tuesday morning, US President Joe Biden mentioned, “It considerations me a terrific deal that we’re going to, after 50 years, resolve {that a} lady doesn’t have the appropriate to decide on.”

“Much more and equally as profound is the rationale used” by the Supreme Courtroom in its draft determination, Biden mentioned, explaining that “an entire vary of rights” assured beneath the notion of privateness could possibly be in danger, together with the usage of contraception and same-sex marriage.

“If it turns into a regulation and if what’s written is what stays, it goes far past the priority of whether or not or not there’s the appropriate to decide on. It goes to different primary rights,” he mentioned.

Al Jazeera’s Patty Culhane, reporting from the US capital, mentioned from a political perspective, Biden was trying to broaden the coalition of individuals pushing again towards the Supreme Courtroom’s place.

Culhane mentioned a Supreme Courtroom leak “actually is unprecedented in trendy occasions”.

“There [are] numerous questions on why it will be leaked,” she mentioned. “If it was a conservative leak, that might put stress on the conservative justices; if they modify their thoughts, everybody on the planet would know Roe v Wade stood as a result of this justice mentioned so.

“However there are others who suppose it was a liberal leak as a result of they need the court docket to see simply what number of protests there are going to be, not simply right here in Washington, however throughout the nation.”

In the meantime, the leaked draft has prompted requires Biden’s Democratic Social gathering – which holds majorities within the Home of Representatives and Senate – to go laws codifying Roe v Wade into regulation earlier than the Supreme Courtroom points a remaining determination.

Reproductive rights activists and US legislators have additionally burdened that girls nonetheless have entry to abortion within the nation.

“Democrats should act on abortion. We management the Home, the Senate, and the Presidency. It’s time for us to steer, and codify Roe. Within the meantime, it’s vital to speak clearly that abortion remains to be authorized,” Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted.

“Information just like the leaked SCOTUS doc (which is a DRAFT) can oftentimes frighten and confuse individuals looking for care. Please know that abortion funds, clinics, and help networks are right here that can assist you. DO NOT cancel your appointments when you want care,” she wrote.

The Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive rights group, has said that if Roe v Wade falls, 26 states are “sure or more likely to ban abortion”.

Overturning the US Supreme Courtroom determination additionally may have international ramifications, mentioned Agnes Callamard, the secretary normal of rights group Amnesty Worldwide.

“Any regression in safety of the appropriate to abortion wouldn’t solely stand to wreck the worldwide notion of the US; it will additionally set a horrible instance that different governments and anti-rights teams may seize upon world wide in a bid to disclaim the rights of girls, ladies and different individuals who can develop into pregnant,” she mentioned in an announcement.

Additional, it will go towards current progress on reproductive rights world wide, added Callamard, who pointed to the legalisation and decriminalisation of abortion in nations resembling Argentina, Mexico and Ireland lately.

“We fervently name on the US authorities to guard the appropriate to authorized and protected abortion. Something much less could be a gross failure to uphold human rights, together with the rights to life, well being, bodily autonomy, privateness and dignity,” Callamard mentioned.