Qatar, other Muslim nations condemn India over anti-Islam remarks | Islamophobia News

Worldwide backlash is rising towards India after a ruling get together official made Islamophobic feedback throughout a televised debate, with Qatar and several other different Muslim nations lodging official protests towards New Delhi and demanding a “public apology”.

A minimum of 5 Arab nations have lodged official protests towards India, and Pakistan and Afghanistan additionally reacted strongly on Monday to the feedback made by two members of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Occasion (BJP).

Anger has poured out on social media, and requires a boycott of Indian items have surfaced in some Arab international locations. Al Jazeera TV on Monday reported that Indian merchandise had been faraway from cabinets in some retailers in Kuwait.

The criticism from Muslim international locations had been extreme, indicating that insulting Prophet Muhammad is a purple line.

The anger has been rising since final week after the 2 BJP members – nationwide spokeswoman Nupur Sharma and Delhi BJP employees Naveen Jindal – made remarks that had been seen as insulting Prophet Muhammad and his spouse Aisha.

Modi’s get together took no motion towards them till Sunday when a refrain of diplomatic outrage started with Qatar and Kuwait summoning their Indian ambassadors to protest.

In an announcement, Qatari Minister of State for International Affairs Soltan bin Saad Al-Muraikhi mentioned “these insulting remarks would result in incitement of non secular hatred, and offend greater than two billion Muslims all over the world”.

Doha is anticipating “a public apology and speedy condemnation of those remarks” from the Indian authorities, mentioned the assertion, which got here as India’s Vice President Venkaiah Naidu visited the rich Gulf state on Sunday in a bid to bolster commerce.

Kuwait warned that if the feedback towards Prophet Muhammad go unpunished, India would see “a rise of extremism and hatred”.

The grand mufti of the sultanate of Oman described the “obscene rudeness” of Modi’s get together in the direction of Islam as a type of “conflict”. And Saudi Arabia mentioned the feedback had been “insulting” and known as for “respect for beliefs and religions” because it and Iran lodged complaints with India.

The Jeddah-based Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) mentioned the remarks got here in a “context of intensifying hatred and abuse towards Islam in India and systematic practices towards Muslims”.

India’s international ministry on Monday rejected feedback by the OIC as “unwarranted” and “narrow-minded”.

The anti-Islam remarks additionally led to anger in India’s archrival and neighbour Pakistan and in Afghanistan.

On Monday, Pakistan’s international ministry summoned an Indian diplomat and conveyed Islamabad’s “sturdy condemnation”, a day after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif mentioned the feedback had been “hurtful” and that “India beneath Modi is trampling spiritual freedoms and persecuting Muslims”.

The Taliban authorities in Afghanistan mentioned India mustn’t enable “such fanatics to insult … Islam and provoke the sentiments of Muslims”.

Narendra Modi
Anti-Muslim sentiments and assaults have risen throughout India beneath Modi [File: Rajesh Kumar Singh/AP]

‘Too little, too late’

India’s embassy in Qatar launched an announcement on Sunday, saying the views expressed towards the Prophet and Islam weren’t that of the Indian authorities however had been made by “fringe components”.

The assertion mentioned sturdy motion had already been taken towards those that made the derogatory remarks.

In one other assertion, India’s international ministry on Sunday mentioned the offensive tweets and feedback didn’t, in any approach, replicate the views of the federal government.

As anger in Gulf states grew, the BJP suspended Sharma and expelled Jindal for hurting the spiritual sentiments of Muslims who make up about 14 p.c of India’s 1.35 billion folks.

Reporting from New Delhi, Al Jazeera’s Pavni Mittal mentioned the BJP members’ remarks put India in a “very embarrassing place” and that the Indian authorities is trying “harm management” however critics in India say the actions are “too little, too late”.

“And that goes again to a historical past of its (BJP’s) high leaders making inflammatory, anti-Islamic and anti-minority feedback overtly, and getting away with it fairly simply,” Mittal mentioned.

“A couple of months in the past, there have been leaders that known as for genocide and violence towards Muslims in public conferences, and rights teams that pointed this out in reviews have been met with a number of resistance. In truth, they noticed their places of work both shut or international funding frozen.”

Protests had been held on Monday towards the anti-Muslim remarks within the monetary capital Mumbai and different Indian cities, whereas dozens of individuals had been arrested for rioting within the northern metropolis of Kanpur.

Prophet Muhammad insult
Muslims demanding arrest of BJP’s Nupur Sharma throughout a protest in Mumbai [Rafiq Maqbool/AP]

Former Indian diplomat Vivek Katju advised Al Jazeera he was “shocked” by the feedback on Islam’s prophet “as a result of that isn’t consistent with what I’ve grown up with – that no spiritual character or religion be denounced”.

India’s previous ties with the Gulf

The remarks made by Sharma throughout a TV programme and Jindal in a tweet threat damaging India’s ties with Arab nations.

India’s commerce with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which incorporates Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, stood at roughly $90bn in 2020-2021. Tens of millions of Indians stay and work in GCC international locations.

Prime Minister Modi lately has strengthened financial ties with the energy-rich nations, the highest supply for the nation’s gasoline imports.

A senior official on the Qatari embassy in New Delhi mentioned Modi’s authorities should publicly distance itself from the feedback.

“Hurting our spiritual sentiments can instantly influence financial ties,” the official mentioned, including they had been checking reviews a couple of boycott of Indian items by some grocery store house owners in Qatar.

Katju, the previous Indian diplomat, mentioned there’s a “mutuality of curiosity between India and the Gulf”.

“And that curiosity is proven within the rising relationship between India and the Gulf states. I don’t see that’s going to go away due to this incident,” he advised Al Jazeera.

India maintains sturdy relations with many Gulf states, which depend on tens of millions of migrant staff from India and elsewhere in South Asia to serve their tiny native populations and drive the equipment of day by day life.

Anti-Muslim sentiments and assaults have risen throughout India beneath Modi as Hindu nationalists really feel emboldened by his common silence on such assaults since he was first elected in 2014.

Over time, Indian Muslims have been usually focused for all the things from their meals and clothes to inter-religious marriages and locations of worship.

Watchdog teams resembling Human Rights Watch and Amnesty Worldwide have warned that assaults might escalate, whereas a number one professional on political violence warned India is on the cusp of a genocide of Muslims.

Rights teams have additionally accused Modi’s ruling get together of trying the opposite approach and generally enabling hate speech towards Muslims. Modi’s get together denies the accusations, however India’s Muslims say assaults towards them and their religion have change into relentless.

Final week, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken mentioned India was seeing “rising assaults on folks and locations of worship”, to which New Delhi responded, calling the feedback “ill-informed”.

Extra not too long ago, spiritual tensions have escalated after some Hindu teams went to a courtroom within the northern metropolis of Varanasi to hunt permission to wish at a Seventeenth-century mosque, claiming that it was constructed by demolishing a temple.

Critics say these tensions have been additional exacerbated by India’s TV channel anchors throughout raucous debates. Sharma had made the feedback towards Prophet Muhammad throughout one such debate.

Seven dead in attack on Chibok community in northeast Nigeria | United Nations News

Chibok first got here to the limelight when Boko Haram kidnapped greater than 200 schoolgirls from the group’s college in April 2014.

Insurgent fighters have killed no less than seven folks in an assault in northeast Borno State in Nigeria, witnesses have informed The Related Press.

The rebels attacked Kautukari village within the Chibok space of Borno on Tuesday night, residents stated on Wednesday. The assault occurred on the similar time that UN Secretary-Basic Antonio Guterres was in the state to fulfill with survivors of violence by the armed group Boko Haram.

The Chibok space is 115km (71 miles) from Maiduguri, the state capital, the place Guterres met with former fighters being reintegrated into society and 1000’s of individuals displaced by the armed teams.

Chibok first got here to the limelight when Boko Haram kidnapped greater than 200 schoolgirls from the group’s college in April 2014, resulting in the viral #BringBackOurGirls campaign.

“They got here in massive quantity with superior firepower (and) took over the group,” stated Hassan Chibok, a group chief. Troops from a close-by navy base have been deployed to repel the assault however “the injury had been accomplished,” Chibok stated, including that “casualties are as much as 10.”

One other resident, Yana Galang, stated no less than seven folks have been killed within the newest violence earlier than the Nigerian navy intervened.

Nigerian police didn’t instantly reply to a request for affirmation of the assault.

Since 2009, Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, has been grappling with assaults within the northeast by armed teams like Boko Haram and its offshoot, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). The teams are preventing to determine Sharia legislation and to cease Western training.

Greater than 35,000 folks have died and thousands and thousands have been displaced by the violence, based on the UN Growth Program.

Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari stated earlier this week that the battle towards the teams is “approaching its conclusion”, citing continued navy assaults and the mass defection of 1000’s of the fighters, a few of whom analysts say are laying down their arms due to infighting throughout the group.

The violence nonetheless continues in border communities and areas nearer to the Lake Chad area, the stronghold of the Islamic State-linked group, ISWAP.

“Issues are getting worse” in Kautukari village and adjourning areas nearer to the forest, stated group chief Chibok, saying the fighters’ presence close to the forest is a contributing issue.

UN to debate Security Council permanent member veto power | United Nations News

A proposal by Liechtenstein would require the US, France, UK, Russia and China to justify vetoing a UNSC motion.

The United Nations is about to debate a provision that will require the 5 everlasting members of the physique’s Safety Council – the US, United Kingdom, France, China and Russia – to justify invoking their veto powers.

The reform to the Safety Council has been floated for years on the UN however has regained new traction following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Presently, the 5 everlasting members can veto any resolutions put forth by the Safety Council. In the meantime, the rotating 10 different members haven’t any such energy.

Moscow has used its veto energy to restrict actions by the UNSC since invading Ukraine on February 24, instantly blocking a resolution that referred to as for Moscow to take away troops from Ukraine.

“We’re notably involved by Russia’s shameful sample of abusing its veto privilege over the previous 20 years,” mentioned the US ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, in a press release.

The adoption of the Liechtenstein decision “might be a big step towards the accountability, transparency and accountability of all” the everlasting members of the Safety Council, she added.

The most recent proposal, put forth by Liechtenstein, is co-sponsored by 50 international locations together with the US. No different everlasting members are presently co-sponsors, though France has indicated it is going to help the transfer, in response to the AFP information company.

The textual content of the proposal, obtained by the AFP, requires the 193 members of the Common Meeting to collect “inside 10 working days of the casting of a veto by a number of everlasting members of the Safety Council, to carry a debate on the state of affairs as to which the veto was solid”.

For the reason that first veto ever used – by the Soviet Union in 1946 – Moscow has deployed it 143 occasions, far forward of the US (86 occasions), Britain (30 occasions) or China and France (18 occasions every).

In early April, the UN basic meeting suspended Russia from the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council. On the time, 93 members voted in help of the suspension, 24 voted towards and 58 abstained.

France, which final used the veto in 1989, proposed in 2013 that the everlasting members collectively and voluntarily restrict their use of the veto within the occasion of a mass atrocity.

Co-sponsored by Mexico and supported by 100 international locations, the proposal has to this point stalled.