Malaysia’s Nagaenthran executed over drugs charges in Singapore | Death Penalty News

Naga’s mom made a last-ditch effort to save lots of her intellectually disabled son, however the case was instantly dismissed.

Nagaenthran Dharmalingam, a Malaysian with studying disabilities who was convicted of drug trafficking in 2010 and whose case attracted international consideration, has been executed in Singapore’s Changi jail.

Naga, who was arrested after police discovered a bundle of 42.7 grammes (1.5 oz) of heroin strapped to his thigh, was hanged simply earlier than daybreak on Wednesday, his household mentioned.

Navin Kumar, Naga’s brother, advised the Reuters information company that the physique could be despatched again to Malaysia the place a funeral could be held within the city of Ipoh.

The Malaysian’s execution got here after the Court docket of Enchantment instantly dismissed an effort by the 34-year-old’s mom to halt her son’s execution. The judges mentioned her last-minute plea was “vexatious”.

Final month, the courtroom known as authorized efforts to save lots of Naga’s life a “blatant and egregious abuse” of the authorized course of, and that it was “improper to interact in or encourage final ditch makes an attempt” to delay or cease an execution.

Naga’s case has drawn international consideration to Singapore’s continued use of the loss of life penalty, notably in drug trafficking circumstances, and sparked renewed debate within the city-state itself.

M Ravi, a lawyer who beforehand represented Naga, expressed his grief over Wednesday’s execution on Twitter, saying: “Om Shanti, could your soul relaxation in peace.”

He added, “Chances are you’ll break us, however not defeat us. Our combat in opposition to the loss of life penalty continues.”

On Monday, just a few hundred individuals turned out to point out their opposition to the loss of life penalty, gathering in Hong Lim Park, a small patch of floor within the metropolis centre that’s the solely place the place the federal government permits public assemblies. The Malaysian authorities, United Nations experts, the European Union, civil society teams and celebrities together with British entrepreneur Richard Branson had additionally known as for Naga’s life to be spared.

“The usage of the loss of life penalty for drug-related offences is incompatible with worldwide human rights legislation,” the UN Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights wrote in an announcement calling on Singapore to halt Naga’s execution. “International locations that haven’t but abolished the loss of life penalty could solely impose it for the “most critical crimes”, which is interpreted as crimes of maximum gravity involving intentional killing.”

Singapore additionally plans to hold Datchinamurthy Kataiah, one other Malaysian convicted of drug offences, on Friday in what the OHCHR mentioned gave the impression to be “an alarming acceleration in execution notices within the nation”. Abdul Kahar Othman, a Singaporean additionally convicted of drug-related offences, was hanged on March 30, the primary individual to be executed by the nation in two years.

Not less than three different males discovered responsible of drug-related offences, Roslan bin Bakar, Rosman bin Abdullah and Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, are susceptible to imminent execution, in line with the UN.

The town-state has amended sentencing pointers to permit judges to impose a life sentence in some trafficking circumstances, offering the defendant meets sure situations, as a substitute for the obligatory loss of life penalty. Singapore maintains among the harshest drug laws on this planet and claims the loss of life penalty acts as a deterrent.

Greater than 50 individuals are reported to be on loss of life row in Singapore, the UN mentioned.

ExxonMobil issued rare penalty in ongoing Indonesian rights case | Corruption News

Medan, Indonesia – Even by the requirements of a justice system recognized for drama, a US courtroom’s newest ruling in a case pitting Indonesian villagers towards one of many world’s strongest oil corporations was uncommon sufficient to boost eyebrows.

John Doe versus ExxonMobil, which has dragged by means of the courts within the District of Columbia for twenty years, took a dramatic flip after a choose dominated final week that the oil big pay $288,900.78 in authorized charges and bills to the plaintiff’s counsel following a disastrous deposition two years in the past.

“Sanctions are a really large deal,” Michel Paradis, a human rights lawyer and lecturer at Columbia Regulation College in New York, informed Al Jazeera. “They’re uncommon and infrequently mirror a choose’s real frustration with how an lawyer or a celebration has acted.”

In 2020, Mark Snell, ExxonMobil’s Asia Pacific regional common counsel, “severely, repeatedly, and perversely obstructed his personal deposition” and refused to reply questions, wasted time and offered inaccurate and evasive solutions about whether or not he was studying from his notes and who ready them, in accordance with courtroom paperwork.

The case was filed within the District Courtroom for the District of Columbia in 2001 after allegations Indonesian villagers were subject to human rights abuses, including sexual assault, torture, rape and wrongful death in and across the ExxonMobil Oil and Gasoline Plant in Lhoksukon, Aceh Province in the course of the late Nineteen Nineties and early 2000s.

Born of a 1999 merger between Mobil Oil Indonesia and Exxon, the corporate was producing greater than $1bn in annual income on the finish of the Nineteen Nineties when it contracted members of the Indonesian military to protect its facility in Aceh at a price of $500,000 monthly. On the time, Aceh was embroiled in a protracted civil conflict between the federal government and the Free Aceh Motion (GAM), a separatist group demanding autonomy from the remainder of the nation.

The 11 plaintiffs within the case, a few of whom are represented by their households, allege that troopers contracted by ExxonMobil carried out sweeping raids geared toward rooting out suspected separatists, torturing and murdering harmless members of the native populace within the course of.

ExxonMobil has strenuously denied understanding about any abuses by contractors beneath its supervision.

‘Beating in regards to the bush’

Andreas Harsono, a researcher at Human Rights Watch Indonesia, stated the courtroom’s newest ruling ought to immediate ExxonMobil to cease “beating in regards to the bush” and interact with the substance of the case.

“The Indonesian safety forces used Exxon firm funds for navy operations designed to crush dissent in Aceh and to extend capability to have interaction in repressive ways towards Acehnese militants,” Harsono informed Al Jazeera.

A spokesperson for ExxonMobil declined to touch upon the most recent improvement.

Terry Collingsworth, who filed the case and is representing the plaintiffs, informed Al Jazeera he couldn’t remark “aside from to verify that this was an award to plaintiffs’ counsel for time and bills in forcing Exxon to adjust to discovery obligations”.

A number of of the plaintiffs, who’re listed within the courtroom paperwork as John and Jane Does in an effort to shield their identities, stated they welcomed the sanction and that it uncovered a double normal across the depositions.

“I used to be open with my proof and I informed Exxon’s attorneys every little thing,” one plaintiff informed Al Jazeera. “We’ve at all times answered all their questions. We’re simply easy individuals, however I’ve grow to be braver through the years and I’m not afraid to face up for my rights.”

One other plaintiff, who alleges that troopers beneath contract to ExxonMobil attacked him with a bayonet leaving him scarred for all times, stated the alleged victims within the case had persistently behaved higher than the defendants.

“I replied to all their questions in full on the deposition,” he informed Al Jazeera.

“We had been the victims and we now have cooperated all through the method. Exxon doesn’t wish to take duty for what they did. We spoke to Exxon’s attorneys at our deposition and informed them every little thing about what occurred to us. How can they are saying now that they don’t bear in mind something?”

“For 20 years we now have been saying the identical factor, We had been crushed and carved up and we now have proof,” he added.

Free Aceh Movement
Aceh noticed clashes between authorities and separatist forces from the Nineteen Eighties to the early 2000s [File: Tarmizy Harva/Reuters]

Choose Royce Lamberth slapped ExxonMobil with the $288,999 penalty after final 12 months admonishing ExxonMonil’s counsel, Alex Oh, for describing her opposing counsel as “unhinged” and “agitated and combative” on account of Snell’s botched deposition.

Oh resigned from a brand new position as the top of the US Securities and Change Fee’s enforcement division in April final 12 months after lower than per week within the job following the choose’s rebuke, saying in her resignation letter that she couldn’t, “deal with this improvement with out it changing into an unwelcome distraction to the vital work of the division”.

“The newest sanction gained’t instantly have an effect on the end result of the case,” stated Paradis, the Columbia Regulation College lecturer.

“Good federal judges – and I might positively embrace Royce Lamberth amongst these – have seen loads and may compartmentalise. So that you gained’t see him ruling towards Exxon out of spite,” Paradis stated, noting nevertheless that ExxonMobil is likely to be much less prone to get the advantage of the doubt within the case going ahead.

“It’s inconceivable to understand how that may play out,” he stated. “However the very last thing you ever need as a litigator is to get to the purpose the place a courtroom can not depend on what you say.”