Shireen Abu Akleh: Who said what in US Congress on slain reporter | Freedom of the Press News

Washington, DC – In a United States Congress that’s largely unconditional in its help for Israel, many lawmakers have condemned the killing of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who was fatally shot by Israeli forces on Wednesday.

Nonetheless, few Congress members talked about Israel by title because the perpetrator of the lethal incident, whereas some legislators who serve in main roles on overseas coverage and press freedom panels ignored the taking pictures altogether.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, has been essentially the most outspoken.

The progressive lawmaker, who’s of Palestinian descent, referred to as for a moment of silence for the slain journalist on the ground of the Home of Representatives on Wednesday and condemned the killing in a number of statements and media appearances.

“An American journalist clearly marked with press credentials was murdered. Doing and saying nothing simply allows extra killings,” she wrote in a tweet directed at President Joe Biden, invoking US navy help to Israel, which totals $3.8bn annually.

“Whether or not you’re Palestinian, American, or not, being killed with US funding should cease,” Tlaib stated.

In a TV interview with Al Jazeera afterward Wednesday, she additionally referred to as for a US-led probe into the incident.

“We have to examine, ourselves, the killing of an American citizen. Anyone that was on the market being a guardian of fact and doing her job was murdered by an apartheid authorities that we proceed to fund with unconditional help,” she stated.

Abu Akleh was a US citizen – a reality emphasised by a number of American officers.

Congressman Mark Pocan, a key Home progressive, additionally urged limiting US aid to Israel.

“Restrictions on help could also be crucial if human rights and universally acceptable norms can’t be adopted,” he wrote on Twitter.

The congressional statements on the killing of Abu Akleh got here from Democratic Get together lawmakers, most of whom are a part of the social gathering’s progressive wing.

Al Jazeera was not capable of finding any assertion by Republican legislators denouncing the killing.

Ilhan Omar, a left-wing, Muslim-American member of the Home, was unambiguous in blaming Israel for the Palestinian journalist’s killing.

“She was killed by the Israeli navy, after making her presence as a journalist clearly recognized,” she wrote on Twitter. “We offer Israel with $3.8 billion in navy help yearly with no restrictions. What’s going to it take for accountability for these human rights violations?”

Omar’s fellow Muslim lawmaker Andre Carson additionally referred to as on the US authorities to “maintain the Israeli authorities accountable for this and all different acts of unjust violence it commits”.

A number of high Democrats joined progressive members of the social gathering in paying tribute to Abu Akleh and calling for an investigation, however they didn’t level the finger at Israel.

“The killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh is an horrific tragedy,” Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a staunch supporter of Israel, wrote on Twitter.

“A radical, goal investigation is required now. Congress is dedicated to the protection of press freedoms worldwide and safety of each journalist, notably these in battle zones.”

Senator Ben Cardin, a senior Democrat and outspoken backer of sturdy US-Israel ties, stated he was “disturbed” by the killing of Abu Akleh.

“Abu Akleh’s loss of life is an assault on a journalist who was sporting her press gear,” he stated in an announcement. “No journalist needs to be killed whereas merely doing their job. I strongly condemn her loss of life and name for an impartial and thorough investigation into the incident.”

Senator Chris Van Hollen additionally urged an impartial probe into the incident.

So did Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut. “Veteran American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was merely doing her job when she was shot and killed early this morning,” he stated in an announcement on Wednesday.

“Her heartbreaking loss of life needs to be thought of an assault on freedom of the press in all places. There should be an intensive investigation and full accountability for these accountable.”

Adam Schiff, chair of the Home Intelligence Committee and co-chair of the Congressional Caucus for the Freedom of the Press, additionally referred to as the fatal shooting of the Palestinian-American journalist a “horrible tragedy”.

“The Israeli navy should conduct an intensive and goal investigation into Abu Akleh’s loss of life, and be clear about its findings,” Schiff stated in an announcement. “My prayers are along with her household, along with her colleague, Ali Al-Samudi, who was additionally wounded, and with members of the press in all places who threat their lives to deliver us the reality.”

Palestinian rights advocates have rejected calls by US officers for Israel to conduct its personal investigation, arguing that the Israeli authorities shouldn’t be trusted to carry itself accountable for alleged warfare crimes.

Steve Chabot, the Republican co-chair of the Press Freedom Caucus, has not launched any formal assertion concerning the killing on his congressional webpage or social media accounts. His workplace didn’t return Al Jazeera’s request for remark by time of publication.

Congressman Andy Levin, a Jewish-American consultant from Michigan, who’s going through off in a major in opposition to fellow Democratic incumbent Haley Stevens after redistricting, stated he was “horrified” by the killing of Abu Akleh.

“Globally, in locations as numerous as Palestine, Mexico and Russia, the worldwide group should come collectively to defend the rights of the free press,” he wrote in a sequence of tweets.

Stevens, who’s backed by quite a few pro-Israel teams, together with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), has stated nothing concerning the incident on her social media accounts or on her congressional web site.

Debbie Dingell, one other Michigan legislator, who represents a big Arab-American group, stated press freedom is “paramount in any democracy”.

The chairs of the Home and Senate overseas coverage panels didn’t deal with the incident in formal statements. The Home Overseas Affairs Committee shared Pelosi’s put up on the killing through its Twitter account.

The deadly taking pictures of Abu Akleh coincided with a busy week in Washington, which is preoccupied with home points, together with a child formula shortage and a failed attempt to cross laws defending abortion rights.

Ro Khanna, a Home progressive representing a district in California, wrote in a social media put up, “The killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh is devastating and a blatant assault on the liberty of the press.”

New York Consultant Yvette Clarke stated the killing is “but one more reason why we want a path to a two-state resolution within the area”.

Congresswoman Marie Newman, who typically criticises Israeli abuses in opposition to Palestinians, stated she was “extraordinarily involved by stories that Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh was shot and killed by Israeli forces whereas sporting a press vest and reporting within the West Financial institution”.

“We should shield the press and maintain these accountable for this heinous crime,” she wrote on Twitter.

Congresswoman Cori Bush, a progressive supporter of Palestinian rights, condemned the “unacceptable assault”.

Congresswoman Betty McCollum, who has championed Palestinian human rights in Congress and launched payments to limit US help to Israel, additionally stated the killing should be “condemned and investigated”.

Some truths about Shireen Abu Akleh’s murder | Freedom of the Press

Shireen Abu Akleh was murdered.

She was not “killed”. She was murdered.

She was shot in the face. Not within the arm or a leg. Within the face. That’s not a “kill” shot. That could be a homicide shot.

Abu Akleh was shot within the face, on function, whereas doing what she has been doing since 1997 for Al Jazeera: telling the reality.

She was murdered for telling, but once more, the reality about how Israel has corralled, bludgeoned, “raided”, evicted, jailed, traumatised, tortured, murdered, and terrorised Palestinian after Palestinian, day after day, week after week, month after month, yr after yr, decade after decade.

Abu Akleh did her job properly. She did it with grace, endurance and resilience regardless of the indignities, horrors and risks. It was her responsibility, obligation, and accountability to bear witness.

Daily, Palestinians threat being murdered as a result of they’re Palestinian.

It doesn’t matter the place they stay – in Gaza, Jerusalem or the West Financial institution – on daily basis, Palestinians threat being murdered as a result of they’re Palestinian.

It doesn’t matter what they do for a residing – if they’ll discover work in any respect – on daily basis, Palestinians threat being murdered as a result of they’re Palestinian.

It doesn’t matter whether or not they’re younger or previous, a person or a girl, Muslim or Christian – on daily basis, Palestinians threat being murdered as a result of they’re Palestinian.

Because it occurs, Abu Akleh, a 51-year-old Palestinian, was in Jenin yesterday morning when she was murdered.

She was there to do her job: reporting on how extra Israeli troopers had been “raiding” – a euphemism for terrorising – extra Palestinians.

She was carrying a helmet and physique armour marked “Press”.

She was standing at a roundabout with different Palestinian journalists when she was shot within the face. An Al Jazeera producer, who survived, was shot within the again.

Abu Akleh’s physique lay on the aspect of a street, subsequent to a wall. Her colleagues screamed for assist as they pulled her away from a sniper’s crosshairs. Later, an ambulance arrived. She died in hospital. Alone.

One other day, one other murdered Palestinian.

However, not like so many other murdered Palestinians, together with four boys who had been dismembered by an Israeli missile whereas enjoying soccer on a seashore, Abu Akleh was well-known. She was on TV. She was fashionable. She was admired and revered as a result of she instructed the reality in regards to the cruelty Palestinians undergo and endure on daily basis.

So, her homicide, not like the murders of so many different Palestinians made information in Europe and North America.

I doubt her homicide would have made a lot information in Europe and North America save for one inconvenient truth: Abu Akleh was additionally an American.

I doubt her assassin knew she was an American after they shot her, on function, within the face. Now they know. Rattling. That meant highly effective folks and establishments who usually don’t give a rattling when Palestinians are murdered needed to say one thing since Abu Akleh was an American.

I don’t bear in mind the US ambassadors to Israel or the United Nations, the State Division or the White Home acknowledging, not to mention condemning, any certainly one of the slayings, since 2000, of 46 Palestinian journalists or saying something in regards to the 144 Palestinian journalists who’ve, since 2018, been shot with rubber or metal bullets, tear-gassed or had stun grenades fired at them.

Do you?

After all not. They weren’t American. That meant they had been nobodies. Inconsequential. Forgettable. Worse, they had been Palestinians. They had been nothing. Most likely instruments of Hamas. Anyway, like each different Palestinian residing, working and going to high school on daily basis in imprisoned Palestine, these make-believe Palestinian journalists requested for it they usually obtained it – good.

Nothing to see right here. Transfer on.

This time, some US politicians and diplomats mentioned they had been “very unhappy” that Abu Akleh had been shot within the face. They mentioned that there wanted to be a “thorough investigation” into who, exactly, shot Abu Akleh within the face.

Blah. Blah. Blah.

They needed to say it. They didn’t imply it. However they needed to say it. In any other case, it’d appear like they didn’t give a rattling {that a} celebrated American journalist had been shot within the face by – a number of witnesses say – an Israeli sniper.

Come on, you and I do know that they don’t actually give a rattling. Abu Akleh could have carried an American passport, however she was not an actual American or perhaps a actual journalist just like the late Daniel Pearl. He labored for the Wall Avenue Journal. He mattered. The style of his homicide mattered.

Abu Akleh was a Palestinian. She labored for Al Jazeera. You and I do know that the majority American politicians and media agree with Donald Rumsfeld who as soon as mentioned that Al Jazeera’s reporting is “vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable”.

The US politicians and diplomats pretending to care about Abu Akleh’s homicide might have instructed America’s dearest pal and consumer state within the Center East a very long time in the past to cease taking pictures and murdering journalists and blowing up buildings the place they work.

They haven’t and they won’t.

As an alternative, they do what they at all times do when Israel murders Palestinians – American or not. Nothing.

Israel is obliged to play alongside to alleviate the phantom strain.

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett performed his half within the pantomime. On cue, he muddied the bloody waters by trotting out the drained and absurd line that the “most ethical military on the planet” doesn’t homicide Palestinians on function.

Abu Akleh’s “unlucky demise,” he steered on Twitter, was a case of Palestinian on Palestinian violence.

“In keeping with the info, we at the moment have, there’s a appreciable probability that armed Palestinians, who fired wildly, are what led to the unlucky demise of the journalist,” Israel’s international ministry tweeted on his behalf.

Most American politicians – Republicans and Democrats – and far of the institution media will consider Bennett. He’s Israel’s prime minister. Israeli prime ministers by no means lie. They, not like Hamas, inform the reality. At all times. They’re America’s pal. Trusted. America by no means doubts the phrase of its Israeli buddies.

America doesn’t must see, not to mention query, Bennett’s so-called “knowledge”. If the Israeli prime minister says he has it, then, there’s a “appreciable probability” that’s what occurred. That’s ok for America and the chattering class.

Doubt sown. Mission achieved. Fast, again to Ukraine.

Certain, US speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote: “The killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh is an (sic) horrific tragedy.”

Newsflash, Speaker Pelosi, taking pictures a Palestinian-American journalist within the face on function shouldn’t be a “tragedy”. It’s a crime. We all know, we all know, Israeli troopers by no means commit crimes.

Fast, again to the newborn components scarcity.

Oh, wait. Bennett’s as soon as iron-clad “knowledge” has gone poof – if it ever existed. Late Wednesday, an Israeli normal mentioned, properly, possibly Abu Akleh was not the sufferer of Palestinian on Palestinian violence. Perhaps an armed Israeli soldier, not an “armed” Palestinian – are there another sort? – shot her within the face. Perhaps.

It doesn’t matter. The “narrative”, like cement, has already been solid.

It goes like this: We’ll by no means know who shot Abu Akleh within the face. Israel desires an “inquiry” to seek out out who shot Abu Akleh. It does. Sincere. The Palestinians is not going to cooperate. Fanatics.

Nonetheless, if an Israeli sniper shot a journalist within the face, that’s the horrible value of warfare. That sniper was doing their responsibility, too, defending Israel from terrorists. She knew the dangers. She obtained in the best way. Powerful luck.

The reality is that it’s going to work as a result of it has labored each different time Israel has murdered a Palestinian.

Shireen Abu Akleh knew that, I think, higher than anybody.

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. 

The 12 Al Jazeera journalists killed on the front lines | Freedom of the Press News

Since launching in 1996, 12 Al Jazeera journalists have been killed within the line of obligation.

Veteran Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, 51, has been killed by Israeli forces within the occupied West Financial institution. She was overlaying an Israeli military raid on the Jenin refugee camp when she was shot within the head.

The media community stated in a statement Abu Akleh was “assassinated in chilly blood” and referred to as on the worldwide neighborhood to carry Israeli authorities accountable.

Since launching in 1996, 12 Al Jazeera journalists have been killed within the line of obligation.

INTERACTIVE Al Jazeera journalists killed on the front lines

Mubarak al-Ebadi

Killed on August 5, 2016, whereas overlaying clashes in Jawf governorate in north Yemen.

Ibrahim al-Omar

Killed on July 11, 2016, by a Russian air raid on Termaneen city in Idlib outskirts -northern Syria.

Zakariya Ibrahim

Killed on December 7, 2015, by shrapnel whereas overlaying a Syrian military bombardment within the province of Homs, Syria.

Mohamed al-Asfar

Killed on June 26, 2015, whereas filming clashes between opposition fighters and Syrian authorities forces within the Manshiya neighbourhood in Deraa, Syria.

Mahran al-Deery

Killed on December 10, 2014, whereas on his technique to cowl clashes between opposition fighters and Syrian authorities forces in Sheikh Miskeen city within the Deraa outskirts, Syria.

Mohamed al-Qasim

Killed on September 10, 2014, in an ambush staged by unidentified assailants whereas on his means again from overlaying occasions within the outskirts of Idlib, Syria.

Hussein Abbas

Killed on Might 1, 2014, whereas on his means again from overlaying occasions within the outskirts of Idlib, Syria.

Mohamed al-Massalma

Killed on January 18, 2013, by a sniper whereas he was overlaying the occasions in Deraa, Syria.

Ali Hassan al-Jaber

Shot useless on March 12, 2011, whereas filming Libyan revolution occasions in Benghazi, Libya.

Rasheed Hamid Wali

Shot useless on Might 20, 2004, when his staff was overlaying clashes between US troops and Jaish al-Mahdi militias in Karbala, Iraq.

Tariq Ayoub

Killed on April 8, 2003, because of extreme accidents he sustained when a US aeroplane bombarded Al Jazeera’s constructing in Baghdad, Iraq.

In honour of the fallen journalists, Al Jazeera established a monument at its headquarters in Doha; a metal tree sculpture with leaves that carry the names of the reporters.

Al Jazeera media network headquarter
Al Jazeera’s metal tree monument carries the names of the journalists who’ve paid the last word worth within the line of obligation [Al Jazeera]

 

Biden names Karine Jean-Pierre as new White House press secretary | Politics News

Jean-Pierre will turn out to be first Black lady to carry key put up when Jen Psaki leaves White Home subsequent week.

Karine Jean-Pierre would be the subsequent White Home press secretary, the Biden administration has introduced, as Jen Psaki is stepping down from the put up subsequent week.

In a press release on Thursday, US President Joe Biden stated Jean-Pierre would step into the press secretary position when Psaki leaves the White Home on Could 13. She will even act as his assistant.

I’m proud to announce that Karine Jean-Pierre will function the following White Home Press Secretary,” Biden stated.

“Karine not solely brings the expertise, expertise and integrity wanted for this troublesome job, however she is going to proceed to prepared the ground in speaking in regards to the work of the Biden-Harris Administration on behalf of the American individuals.”

Jean-Pierre is at the moment the White Home’s deputy press secretary and deputy assistant to Biden.

She beforehand held senior communication and political roles in Biden’s presidential marketing campaign crew and when he served as vice-president in the course of the Obama administration, the White Home assertion stated.

Jean-Pierre additionally was the chief public affairs officer of the progressive group MoveOn.org and a former political analyst for NBC and MSNBC.

Psaki praised her successor, noting the importance of the history-making appointment.

“She would be the first Black lady and the primary brazenly LGBTQ+ particular person to function the White Home Press Secretary,” Psaki stated. “Illustration issues and she is going to give a voice to many, but additionally make many dream large about what is actually potential.”

U.S. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki holds the daily press briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S. March 7, 2022.
Psaki says Jean-Pierre ‘will give a voice to many’ [File: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

Jean-Pierre stated Thursday was a “very emotional day”, when requested about turning into the primary Black lady to function White Home press secretary. “It is a historic second, and it’s not misplaced on me,” she stated throughout a briefing.

“I perceive how necessary it’s for thus many individuals on the market, so many alternative communities, that I stand on their shoulders and I’ve been all through my profession. And so, it’s an honour and a privilege to be behind this podium in a few week or so when Jen is prepared.”

When she took the press secretary position, Psaki stated publicly that she aimed to stay within the job for a few yr.

In Thursday’s assertion, Biden thanked Psaki for her contribution to his administration, saying she “set the usual for returning decency, respect and decorum to the White Home Briefing Room”.

“I wish to say thanks to Jen for elevating the bar, speaking instantly and honestly to the American individuals, and maintaining her humorousness whereas doing so. I thank Jen her service to the nation, and need her the perfect as she strikes ahead.”

 

UN condemns Mali’s ban on French media | Freedom of the Press News

Geneva, Switzerland – The UN Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights criticised Mali’s resolution to ban French media shops and referred to as on its navy rulers to reverse their resolution.

“We’re deeply dismayed by the Malian media regulator’s resolution to definitively droop Radio France Worldwide [RFI] and France24,” stated a spokesperson for Excessive Commissioner Michelle Bachelet on Friday.

“These suspensions are the newest in a string of actions curbing press freedom and the liberty of expression in Mali, and are available at a time when extra, not much less, scrutiny is required.”

Mali’s navy leaders first imposed the suspensions on March 16, accusing the 2 broadcasters of airing false allegations about reviews of human rights violations by the military.

On Wednesday, the Excessive Authority for Communication introduced these provisional suspensions can be definitive.

Journalist associations have denounced a rise in assaults and smear campaigns towards reporters over the previous yr, particularly towards representatives of French media shops. Overseas and native reporters overlaying Mali have denounced a worsening of the local weather for media professionals within the nation.

“We didn’t have this sort of scrutiny earlier than,” stated a freelancer contributing to French media, who requested to not be named for safety issues. “The scenario has bought worse since tensions between France and Mali began to extend. It’s a political problem.”

‘Pervasive chilling impact’

On Friday, the Committee to Shield Journalists additionally referred to as on the authorities to reverse their resolution to ban RFI and France 24.

“Malian authorities’ resolution to solidify these suspensions signifies simply how dedicated they’re to denying these of their nation entry to info,” stated Angela Quintal, CPJ’s Africa programme coordinator, in a press release.

On February 6, French journalist Benjamin Roger, a reporter on task for Jeune Afrique, was arrested and expelled inside 24 hours of his arrival within the Malian capital, Bamako. The authorities stated the reporter didn’t have press accreditation. Per week earlier, they introduced it will grow to be more durable for media representatives to acquire a media allow.

“Press accreditation has not often been demanded till now,” stated Reporters With out Borders in a press release, “and missing it has not prevented journalists from working freely.”

On April 8, Reporters With out Borders marked one yr from the kidnapping of French journalist Olivier Dubois, a correspondent for French publications Libération, Le Level, and Jeune Afrique. On March 14, the al Qaeda-linked Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), a coalition of armed teams, launched a video exhibiting he was nonetheless alive.

French support employee Sophie Petronin was kidnapped in Gao in 2016 and launched after 4 years. In 2013, Ghislaine Dupont and Claude Verlon, two journalists of RFI, had been kidnapped and killed by gunmen within the Malian city of Kidal as they completed an interview with a Tuareg separatist chief.

A member of the Malian special forces stands guard during the ceremony that celebrates the national army day
A member of the Malian particular forces stands guard in Kati, Mali [File: Florent Vergnes/AFP]

In the meantime, the UN denounced how such a scenario is inducing these reporters who’re nonetheless contained in the nation to observe self-censorship.

“The present local weather is one with a pervasive chilling impact on journalists and bloggers,” UN Spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani advised reporters on Friday.

“Our workplace continues to doc critical allegations of violations of worldwide human rights regulation and worldwide humanitarian regulation in lots of elements of the nation, and we stay severely involved by steps to additional shrink the already restricted civic house.”

Tensions between Mali and France have elevated since a navy coup led by Colonel Assimi Goita on August 8, 2020, that overthrew elected President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, who was supported by France.

In June 2021, France, a former colonial energy within the area, halted its joint navy operations with Malian forces awaiting ensures that civilians return to positions of energy.

French President Emmanuel Macron introduced he would begin a withdrawal of troops, about 5,100 troopers, stationed within the area since 2013 beneath its so-called Operation Barkhane spanning 5 nations within the Sahel – Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania and Niger.

In response to the military’s energy seize in Mali, the Financial Group of West African States (ECOWAS) regional bloc and the African Union suspended Mali from their organisations and threatened sanctions.

In January, Malian Prime Minister Choguel Kokalla Maiga accused France of selling insecurity and division within the nation and expelled its ambassador.

In response to Reporters With out Borders, Mali is ranked 99th out of 180 nations within the 2021 World Press Freedom Index.